The UK Government narrative on terrorism is a lie and has been a lie for more than a decade

The UK Government narrative on terrorism is a lie.

The UK Government narrative on terrorism has been a lie for more than a decade.

The deception of the Britsh public relates to British Military Terrorism in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya and the concealment of British Military Terrorism in those countries.

In all likelihood, British Military Terrorism has also taken place in Syria and has been concealed.

The non-disclosure of Britiah Military Terrorism

Successive UK governments have promoted the notion that they are fighting against terrorism.

At no point, to the best of my knowledge, has any UK Government publicly acknowledged that it has itself been committing acts of terrorism (as defined in Section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000).

The UK military action in Afghanistan since 2001 has been "terrorism" as defined in UK Law.

UK military action in Iraq before the 2003 Iraq War was "terrorism" as defined in UK Law.

The 2003 Iraq War was "terrorism" in UK Law.

See, for example, Was the Iraq War "terrorism" in UK Law?

The UK military intervention in Libya was also "terrorism" in UK Law.

The more recent RAF air strikes in Iraq are also "terrorism" in UK Law.

See, for example, Unlawful UK air strikes in Iraq - Letter of 25th September 2014 to UK Attorney General and Solicitor General and RAF Terrorism in Iraq - Section 56 offences by David Cameron MP and Michael Fallon MP reported to West Midlands Police

The concealment of British Military Terrorism

Important individuals and organisations in the public life of the United Kingdom have concealed British Military Terrorism from the consciousness of the British public.

The Police have concealed British Military Terrorism.

For example, on 2nd February 2010 I wrote to Sir Paul Stephenson, then Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police and Assistant Commissioner John Yates regarding Section 56 offences by Tony Blair and others.

See Terrorism Act 2000 Section 56 offences etc - Letter of 2nd February 2010 to Sir Paul Stephenson and John Yates

More recently, I wrote to Chief Constable Chris Sims and Assistant Chief Constable Marcus Beale  about Section 56 offences by David Cameron and Michael Fallon.

See RAF Terrorism in Iraq - Section 56 offences by David Cameron MP and Michael Fallon MP reported to West Midlands Police

The Chilcot Inquiry is concealing British Military Terrorism.

On 2nd February 2010 I sent the following letter to the Iraq Inquiry: The Iraq Inquiry: Letter of 2nd February 2010 to Sir John Chilcot

The UK Attorney General and Solicitor General are concealing British Military Terrorism.

For example, Attorney General Jeremy Wright and Solicitor General Robert Buckland allowed the House of Commons to be deceived on 26th September 2014 regarding the proposed air strikes in Iraq.

See Unlawful UK air strikes in Iraq - Letter of 25th September 2014 to UK Attorney General and Solicitor General

The silence of the mainstream UK media

And what can we say of the silence of the mainstream UK media on British Military Terrorism?

I am not aware of a single mainstream UK media outlet, whether written media, broadcast media or online media, which has seriously asked the question of what terrorism is.

I have over the years contacted dozens of UK journalists about the issue.

Not one has published anything on the issue.

Why?

Laziness?

Bias?

DA-Notice?

The UK media needs to explain its shameful silence on this important issue.

The effects of concealment of British Military Terrorism

If the Metropolitan Police had acted, in 2003, on my anonymous report of Section 56 offences by Tony Blair many lives would, I think, have been saved.

If the British public had known in 2003 that the Iraq War was terrorism and that UK military action in Afghanistan was terrorism would the UK have continued to participate? I think not.

Would the UK have spent tens of billions of pounds on terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq? I think not.

If the British public had been informed that the RAF air strikes in Libya were terrorism would they have continued? I think not.

Thousands of Moslems have died, in my view, because the Police and other UK institutions have concealed British Military Terrorism.

Dozens, perhaps hundreds. of British military personnel have died as "terrorists" (in the meaning of Section 40 of the Terrorism Act 2000). For the moment, the families of dead British Military Terrorists are unaware they died as terrorists.

Hundreds of British Military personnnel have lost limbs as "terrorists" (in the meaning of Section 40 of the Terrorism Act 2000). What will their feelings be when they realise that they lost their limbs as terrorists?

Cognitive dissonance

The British public has been conditioned by more than a decade of lies about British Military Terrorism.

It won't, I anticipate, be easy for the public to work through the implications of British Military Terrorism.

What of the families of military personnel who died as terrorists?

What of the family of Lee Rigby who died as a terrorist?

What of the families of military personnel who lost limbs as terrorists?

What of those who lost limbs as terrorists?

What of the media which has, on many occasions, referred to British Military Terrorists as "heroes"?

For some, coming to terms with the implications of British Military Terrorism will be profoundly disturbing.

The cognitive dissonance cannot be put off for ever, in my view.